why should the null hypothesis be that mentions of left extremism should be equal to mentions of right wing extremism? this is the aggregate human knowledge, it is like saying ornithology is mentioned less than quantum chromodynamics hence Wikipedia is biased against ornithology. if there is an argument to be made about the equal occurance of left vs right wing extremism in the world I would like to see it.
why should the null hypothesis be that mentions of left extremism should be equal to mentions of right wing extremism? this is the aggregate human knowledge, it is like saying ornithology is mentioned less than quantum chromodynamics hence Wikipedia is biased against ornithology. if there is an argument to be made about the equal occurance of left vs right wing extremism in the world I would like to see it.
Great research.
I wonder if perhaps Far-Right philosophies more often diverge from the norm in the world and so appear more often in Wikipedia?
It's pretty much conclusive, not suggestive..